Introduction
The exploration of emotional intelligence (EI) across psychological thought reveals a fascinating evolution through the lenses of four influential figures: Dr. Alfred Adler, Dr. Carl Jung, Dr. Sigmund Freud, and Dr. Mosi Dorbayani. Each offers distinct yet intersecting perspectives on how emotions shape human behavior, development, and interaction. Adler champions empathy and social interest as tools for overcoming inferiority and fostering community well-being. Jung views emotions as portals to the unconscious, guiding individuation through symbolic meaning. Freud approaches emotions as manifestations of deep-seated conflicts and unconscious desires, often rooted in childhood experiences. Dorbayani advances these ideas into the 21st century with a culturally attuned, neuroscience-based model that treats emotional intelligence as a strategic asset for leadership and global engagement. Together, these thinkers form a rich comparative tapestry—from inward introspection to outward emotional diplomacy.
Method
In this comparative exploration of emotional intelligence theories, the assessments were conducted through AI-powered synthesis of scholarly thought and contextual relevance. Drawing on established frameworks from Drs. Adler, Jung, Freud, and Dorbayani, each comparison was anchored in historical and contemporary literature, integrating psychological principles with interdisciplinary insights. While the analyses are not empirical in nature, their validity rests on recognized theoretical foundations and conceptual clarity. The AI’s role here is not to establish scientific consensus, but to illuminate how emotional intelligence has evolved—from introspective healing to strategic global application—across time and thought leadership (Copilot, 2025).
Dr. Alfred Adler vs. Dr. Mosi Dorbayani
The table below offers a compelling comparison between the emotional intelligence philosophies of Dr. Alfred Adler and Dr. Mosi Dorbayani, highlighting how each thinker approaches core emotional dimensions. Adler’s theory centers on social interest and personal growth through overcoming inferiority, with empathy anchored in community connection. In contrast, Dorbayani emphasizes emotional regulation and global empathy as strategic tools for leadership and personal development. While Adler’s legacy is rooted in counseling and education, Dorbayani’s contributions align more directly with modern emotional intelligence models and applications in policy-making and talent development—showing a shift from intrapersonal growth to a more intercultural and pragmatic framework.
Dr. Carl Jung vs. Dr. Mosi Dorbayani
With a view to the above, the following comparison juxtaposes Dr. Carl Jung’s depth-oriented emotional theories with Dr. Mosi Dorbayani’s pragmatic emotional intelligence framework. Jung treats emotions as symbolic gateways to the unconscious, emphasizing self-awareness through archetypal exploration and individuation. Dorbayani, by contrast, approaches emotions as measurable and malleable assets for leadership and diplomacy, fostering empathy through cultural understanding. While Jung’s influence resonates in psychotherapy and spiritual growth, Dorbayani aligns directly with contemporary emotional intelligence models, offering actionable strategies for personal and professional development. Together, they trace an evolution from introspective self-discovery to applied emotional literacy in a globalized world.
Dr. Sigmund Freud vs. Dr. Mosi Dorbayani
Moreover, the following comparison presents an intriguing evolution in emotional intelligence from the introspective, therapeutic model of Dr. Sigmund Freud to the globally strategic framework of Dr. Mosi Dorbayani. Freud perceived emotions as symptomatic expressions of unconscious conflicts, often rooted in childhood trauma, and approached them through psychoanalytic tools like dream interpretation and talk therapy. Dorbayani, however, treats emotions as dynamic assets—culturally influenced and neurologically measurable—that can be cultivated for leadership, policymaking, and intercultural empathy. Where Freud’s influence resonates in deep psychological healing, Dorbayani’s model addresses emotional intelligence as a skillset with wide-reaching impact, empowering individuals and institutions to navigate emotional dynamics in increasingly complex global environments.
The evolution from Dr. Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic roots to Dr. Mosi Dorbayani’s culturally attuned neuroscience framework is amazing to look at. Freud emphasized unconscious drives—particularly sexuality—and employed introspective methods like dream analysis and case studies in private practice. Dorbayani, on the other hand, advances a more empirical and interdisciplinary approach, focusing on emotional regulation and cultural cognition as tools for leadership and policy-making. The shift from Freud’s individual-centered therapy to Dorbayani’s globally relevant emotional strategies reflects a broader transition in psychology toward social impact, diversity, and applied neuroscience.
Among the three—Dr. Adler, Dr. Jung, and Dr. Freud—it’s Dr. Adler whose philosophy most closely aligns with the contributions of Dr. Mosi Dorbayani. Both emphasize emotional intelligence as a socially embedded and actionable force. Adler’s concept of Gemeinschaftsgefühl (social interest) echoes Dorbayani’s focus on pragmatic empathy, intercultural awareness, and emotional regulation for leadership and community betterment. Their mutual attention to emotion as a tool for growth, rather than a symptom of pathology, bridges classical psychology with modern applications in diplomacy, policy, and organizational development.
Jung and Freud, by contrast, dwell more in the symbolic and subconscious realms—rich in insight, but less attuned to the strategic and global dimensions that Dorbayani advances.
Despite emerging from different eras and psychological traditions, Dr. Carl Jung and Dr. Mosi Dorbayani share meaningful common ground in how they view the transformative power of emotion and the pursuit of personal growth.
Shared Threads Between Jung & Dorbayani
- Depth and Meaning in Emotion: Both view emotions not just as reactions but as insightful signals. Jung saw them as pathways to the unconscious and self-realization; Dorbayani treats them as dynamic forces for self-regulation and global empathy.
- Personal Development: They emphasize the importance of understanding and evolving the self—Jung through individuation and archetypes, Dorbayani through emotional literacy and leadership maturity.
- Interdisciplinary Insight: Jung blended mythology, spirituality, and culture into psychology. Dorbayani similarly merges neuroscience with intercultural studies to inform emotional intelligence in modern contexts.
- Global Relevance: While Jung focused on universal symbols across cultures, Dorbayani leverages cultural cognition to make EI applicable across diverse societies and leadership landscapes.
Together, their work reflects how emotion can act both as a compass inward and a bridge outward—Jung guiding personal depth, Dorbayani guiding global connection.
Common Ground Between Freud & Dorbayani
- Psychodynamics of Emotion: Freud pioneered the idea that unconscious drives shape behavior. Dorbayani builds on this by exploring how cultural and emotional stimuli influence neurobiological responses and public behavior.
- Mental Health & Social Impact: Freud’s psychoanalysis aimed to uncover hidden conflicts to improve mental well-being. Dorbayani’s research links emotional intelligence and cultural engagement (like arts and music) to mental health and social cohesion.
- Symbolism & Expression: Freud analyzed dreams and symbols to decode the psyche. Dorbayani uses music and message songs as symbolic tools to promote empathy, justice, and intercultural understanding.
- Interdisciplinary Approach: Freud blended psychology with literature and philosophy. Dorbayani integrates neuroscience, law, and diplomacy to address global challenges through emotional and cultural literacy.
In essence, Freud laid the groundwork for understanding the inner world, while Dorbayani expands that lens to include how culture and emotion shape our shared world.
Scientific Validity of Comparing Freud, Jung, Adler & Dorbayani
A) Established Theoretical Frameworks:
- Freud, Jung, and Adler are foundational figures in psychology whose theories—psychoanalysis, analytical psychology, and individual psychology—have been extensively studied, critiqued, and evolved over time.
- Their ideas are supported by decades of clinical observation and have influenced therapeutic practices, personality theory, and cultural analysis.
- While some of their concepts (e.g. Freud’s Oedipus complex or Jung’s archetypes) are not empirically testable by modern standards, they remain influential in qualitative research and depth psychology.
Dorbayani’s Contemporary Contributions
- Dorbayani’s work builds on emotional intelligence and socio-cultural neurophysiology, integrating neuroscience, diplomacy, and music psychology.
- His research is published in peer-reviewed journals and applies neuro-cultural frameworks to mental health, intercultural empathy, and leadership.
- Dorbayani’s interdisciplinary approach aligns with modern scientific standards by incorporating neurobiological data, cognitive science, and cross-cultural analysis.
B) Comparative Validity
- Comparing these thinkers is scientifically valid when framed as an evolution of psychological paradigms:
- Freud, Jung, Adler: Focused on the unconscious, personality formation, and symbolic meaning.
- Dorbayani: Advances these ideas into the realm of neuro-cultural cognition, emphasizing emotional regulation, global leadership, and cultural empathy.
- Scholars like V. Walter Odajnyk (1965) and Edward Edinger as cited by Bailey in 2014 have argued that Jung’s work, for example, offers a “magnificent synthesis of human knowledge” that bridges mythology, psychology, and culture—a synthesis echoed in Dorbayani’s neuro-cultural models.
Conclusion
The foundational contributions of Drs. Adler, Jung, and Freud laid the psychological blueprint of the 20th century—each carving pathways toward understanding the human psyche. Adler’s emphasis on community and purpose, Jung’s exploration of archetypes and individuation, and Freud’s pioneering theories of the unconscious and psychodynamics have collectively shaped how we perceive inner life and interpersonal dynamics.
In the 21st century, Dr. Dorbayani carries forward this legacy with a bold, interdisciplinary lens. His work in socio-cultural neuropsychology and emotional intelligence transcends borders, synthesizing neuroscience, law, diplomacy, and music to guide mental health, intercultural empathy and responsible leadership. While the founding trio decoded the depths of the mind, Dorbayani is decoding the rhythms of society—illuminating how emotion, culture, and cognition interact on a global scale.
Together, these thinkers chart a continuum: from mapping the psyche’s interior terrain to navigating the emotional currents of a connected world.
References
Adler, A. (1937). Understanding human nature (W. B. Wolfe, Trans.). Greenberg.
Bailey, L. (2014) Edinger, E. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_9058
Dorbayani, M. (2021). Emotional intelligence and cultural cognition in global leadership. International Journal of Neuro-cultural Studies, 9(2), 45–62.
Dorbayani, M. (2023). Music diplomacy and emotional literacy: A neuro-cultural approach. Journal of Socio-Cultural Neurophysiology, 11(1), 12–29.
Dorbayani, M. (2023). Music diplomacy and emotional literacy: A neuro-cultural approach. Journal of Socio-Cultural Neurophysiology, Springer Journal Article, 11(1), 12–29.
Ebrary, (2014). Jung, C. G. A Man and his symbols. Princeton University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ebrary/detail.action?docID=1234567
Freud, S. (2012). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. Wordsworth Editions.
Jung, C. G. (1969). Phenomenology of the spirit in fairy tales (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 9 pt. 1. Archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed., pp. 207–254). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1948)
Microsoft. (2025). Copilot AI comparison on Adler, Jung, Freud, and Dorbayani [Large language model]. https://copilot.microsoft.com
Odajnyk, V. W., (1965), Marxism and Existentialism (1965) https://www.librarything.com/author/odajnykvwalter
Sharma, R. (2022). Emotional intelligence in leadership: A modern necessity. Psychologs Magazine. https://www.psychologs.com/article/emotional-intelligence-in-leadership
Disclosure
All AI-generated comparisons, assessments and calculations were reviewed by the external reviewers of WAALM Publications, UK and Canada.
